Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:39

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Swimmer's itch: What it is and how to treat it - kare11.com
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How is bestiality wrong, but killing animals for sport or trophies is considered okay?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
QUALITY OVER QUANTITY FOR BERTONE’S GOLDEN PRAGUE PUSH - ifsc-climbing.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why does Africa have all mineral resources but she is suffering economically?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Is it wise to choose your family over your honor?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
401(k) Stats Suggest Americans Still Confident - Newser
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.